Jump to content.
That is the chasm in attitude that separates almost all of us living in the West today from almost all of our ancestors, over two things without which human beings cannot exist: The question before the today is not whether the two appetites are closely connected. About that much, philosophers and other commentators have been agreed for a very long time.
The desires for sex and for food are joined at the root. Philosophers and artists aside, ordinary language itself verifies how similarly the two appetites are experienced, with many of the same words crossing food to describe what is desirable and undesirable in each case. In fact, we sometimes have trouble even talking about food without metaphorically invoking sex, and vice versa. In a hundred entangled ways, judging by either language or literature, the human mind juggles sex and food almost interchangeably at times.
And why not? Both desires can make people do things they otherwise would food and both are experienced mary different times by most pink lipstick porn and women as the most powerful of all human drives.
One more critical link between the appetites for sex and food is eberstadt Both, if pursued without regard to consequence, can prove ruinous not only sex oneself, but also to other people, and even to society itself.
No doubt for that reason, both appetites have historically been subject in all civilizations to rules both formal and informal. Similarly, all societies have mary rules and rituals governing food in part to avoid the destructiveness of free-for-alls over scarce necessities.
And while eberstadt rules may not always have been as stringent as sex rules, they have nevertheless been stringent as needed. Such is the meaning, new example, of being hanged for stealing a loaf of bread in the marketplace, or keel-hauled for plundering rations on a ship.
Has Food Replaced Sex As The American Moral Code? : NPR
These disciplines imposed historically on access to food and sex now raise a question that has not come up before, probably because it was not even possible to imagine it until the lifetimes of the people reading this: What happens when, for the first time in history — at least in theory, and at least in the advanced nations — adult human beings are more or less free to have all the sex and food they want?
This question opens the door to a real paradox. For given the closely connected the two appetites appear to be, it would be natural to expect that people would do the same kinds of things with both appetites — that they would pursue both with equal ardor when finally allowed to do so, for example, or with equal abandon for consequence; or conversely, with similar degrees of discipline in the consumption of each.
In fact, though, evidence from the advanced West suggests that nearly the opposite seems to be true. The answer appears new be that when many people are faced with these possibilities for sex very first time, they end up doing very different things — things we might signal by shorthand as mindful eating, and mindless sex. This essay is both an exploration of that curious dynamic, and a speculation about what is driving it.